Queen Elizabeth II’s OLD legacy: The Gatekeeper Dies! In Four Parts.
Long Live the Queen, Even in Death? Part 1 of 4.
At age 96, Queen Elizabeth just died and, soon enough thereafter, more parts of her monarchy — empire if you will — of the British Commonwealth and Britain’s Commonwealth realm, United Kingdom, and British Overseas Territories will push itself out of the nest, split away to become fully independent of the Crown.
A British era of far-flung lordship is unraveling. What is breaking it apart is royal divorces, royal bad behavior, and commoners allowed to marry those of royal lineage, their offspring then continuing the royal line as the new kings and queens, thus allegedly polluting it with “bad (insufficient) blood.” Queen Elizabeth’s sins of controlling the British empire perhaps outweighed her virtues. I’m fully explain, below.
May I judge all this royal crap to be ignorance — pure vanity — and unbefitting of the human family in the 21st century. The sin of England, according to seer Edgar Cayce (1877–1945), my mentor, is “Thinking that one man is better than another.” I’m talking about the de facto caste system of the UK’s royals, who lord it over their masses as their superiors. My attitude, “Who today gives a royal s_ _ _ about royals’ titles and sense of ‘entitlement,’ their ceremonies, and packaging. They put on their pants the same way I do, three legs at a time (if I claimed two, they’d claim they put on three at a time). In short, I am/you are/we are the equal to any king or queen in status, ability, and character. We have it all — and don’t know it. Until then, we are the puppets, they the puppeteers.
*****
My job is to be politically incorrect, even when no one else will. Therefore, here is my “summation,” as a lawyer would put it. The British monarchy began with Alfred the Great, who reigned from 871–899 A.D. He is Queen Elizabeth II’s 32nd great, great, great grandfather. Here’s a bit of the monarchy’s seamy, steamy, story running from then through now: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/britains-royal-history-more-than-1000-years-of-family-drama/
England’s game of thrones was sealed by William the Conqueror, commonly known as William the Bastard (ha!). He was England’s first “Norman” King (1066–1087 A.D.). Norman? Norman means Vikings who settled in northern France (Normandy) and sent out numerous expeditions of conquest or expansion to the European Western world — including England. Date the England we know from “about” 1,000 A.D., or perhaps in 1066 with William the Conqueror’s Battle of Hastings.
*****
History and our Bible are replete with kings and conquerors from many continents, countries, and areas who established their power over regions, city-states, religions, etc. They did this through a witches’ brew of power, talent, and blood. Check out Fritz Springmeier’s book, Bloodlines of the Illuminati, consisting of 13 international families (he lists them) leading the charge along with some 300 subordinate families (including my Edwards family, and I am also a a descendent from the royal House of Stuart. Here are Springmeier’s 13 families:
Granted, Springmeier was conspiracy minded and his research is overdrawn — but his essential point is well taken. These families have intermarried from time immemorial, even from ancient Greek and Egyptian times — but particularly European royalty lines — and thus are all linked, the world over — as they trumpet their omnipresent, omniscient, power from earth to the heavens above. Some of them even claim linkage to Jesus Christ, from the alleged family he sired when he supposedly moved about in the world after his crucifixion.
I ain’t buyin’ it, readers. The monarchical power brokers’ vaunted motifs and anecdotes of valor, leading to subjection of the masses, are all damaged goods and unreliable accounts. Instead, their calling card is always power! They want you to know they rule you — and you are nothing without their protection, ministration, and guardianship — typically, or until more recently, at the point of a gun!
*****
From thus we come to Queen Elizabeth II, a scion of rigidity, diplomacy, carefulness, authoritarianism, ceremony, tradition, strict protocols, and, most of all, a British “stiff upper lip.” She represents the past, and the past died with her death on September 8, 2022. Yeah, to be quite honest, she always had one foot firmly planted in the past and only, from time to time, dipped one cautious, disapproving toe on the other foot into the bottomless anti-royal lake of the present. Yes, many traditions died with her, and that is the OLD legacy regarding which I speak disparagingly, as history, not utopia.
*****
Here are the “rules” she tried to adhere to, communicate, or enforce. (1) Royals cannot marry commoners. Royal blood can only marry royal blood and did so for 1,000 years! (2) Young male royalty, destined by royal succession to kingship, must marry a virgin (a what?!) royal. (3) Royals must be above reproach in public and private behavior. (4) Royals are not allowed to divorce, whether before or when in office. That is a bad standard to establish, a deficiency in role modeling. (5) Royals must be faithful in their marriages. (6) The king or queen is the titular head of the Church of England (the wedding of church and state!); ceremonies often take place in the C. of E.’s cathedrals. (7)) Always, always keep a stiff upper lip. (8) Only make concessions to the above when you have to, and do so grudgingly, disapprovingly. Of such is social order and kingship — or queenship — over others. (9) Set the highest standard of public relations and dependence on you from others, your vassals. You are better than they are. Act like it.
There are a few other traditions. Male heirs must excel in military service and sports (notably, polo and horsemanship) — and be sent to a military-prep boy’s school to bully or be bullied, not protected. Male royals are expected to become exemplary, brave, commissioned British military officers. Royals should be steeped in the classics of literature and history and excel in educational level, including in college, and earn top grades. The most high-profile royals are constantly front and center, each making some 300 public appearances a year in public relations duties — mostly speeches — for the Crown. They are also world statesmen, not “politicians.” They leave day to day governance to the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of their associated countries’, and holdings’, independent elected governments.
Trying to slavishly follow the nine rules, and traditions, I enumerated above is what got Queen Elizabeth II in trouble within history and destiny. I will soon describe to you the contemporary royal characters we all know and their deeds that make the British monarchy of today an iffy long-term proposition. Times have changed, and the Brits’ royal leaders are now a step behind in ennobling tradition, behavior, and in reading and accommodating to their times and real status. Royal government by decree, tradition, and force no longer works.
Love,
Gene (a direct relative of Mary Queen of Scots from the European House of Stuart),
*****
You have just read “The Daily Letter,” #77, published on 10//6/2022, by Gene W. Edwards.
KEY WORDS AND SUBJECTS: Part I or 4:
Bloodlines of the Illuminati.
King Alfred the Great.
Queen Elizabeth II
royalty: all about it
Nine expectations required of British royals, to keep their power.
Springmeier, Fritz
William the Conqueror (William the Bastard)
*****
Queen Elizabeth II’s OLD legacy: The Gatekeeper Dies!
Queen Elizabeth II’s History: Part 2 of 4.
By Gene W. Edwards.
It is some of Queen Elizabeth’s expectations, requirements, and decisions that seriously undermined British power in her time and going forward. I’ll soon explain. But first, let’s look at her beginnings — her immediate ancestors — to fathom the trends that followed.
King George V (1910–1936) was an able leader. He sired two sons, Edward and George. Edward became King Edward VIII and then George became King George VI. (See below.) The eldest, Edward VIII, was a playboy and Nazi sympathizer who disdained royal protocols. Shortly after becoming king but before his coronation, scheduled for a year later, he planned to marry a soon to be twice divorced and adulterous with him American woman, Wallis Simpson. He only ruled from January 20 to December 11, 1936 before he abdicated (quit), his scandalous behavior being unacceptable to all. Otherwise, he would have faced a general election, a kind of British equivalent to an American impeachment and conviction, something never before entertained in Britain — and therefore unthinkable!
That made George VI king, from 1936–1952. He had two daughters and his oldest, the one they nicknamed Lilibet, Edward III’s niece, became Queen Elizabath II (1936–2022), the longest-serving woman in all of recorded history and the second longest head of state, after France’s Louis XIV, in history! Louis lasted 72 years at it, Lilibet almost 71 years.
*****
Here’s the short version of her reign, from Wikipedia’s “Elizabeth II.”
“Elizabeth was born in Mayfair, London as the first child of the Duke and Duchess of York (later King George VI and Queen Elizabeth). Her father acceded to the throne in 1936 upon the abdication of his brother, King Edward VIII, making Elizabeth the heir presumptive. She was educated privately at home and began to undertake public duties during the Second World War, serving in the Auxiliary Territorial Service. In November 1947, she married Philip Mountbatten, a former prince of Greece and Denmark, and their marriage lasted 73 years until his death in April 2021. They had four children: Charles, Anne, Andrew, and Edward.
“When her father died in February 1952, Elizabeth — then 25 years old — became queen of seven independent Commonwealth countries: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon (known today as Sri Lanka), as well as Head of the Commonwealth. Elizabeth reigned as a constitutional monarch through major political changes such as the “Troubles” in Northern Ireland, devolution in the United Kingdom, the decolonization of Africa, and the United Kingdom’s accession to the European Communities and withdrawal from the European Union. The number of her realms varied over time as territories gained independence and some realms became republics. Her many historic visits and meetings include state visits to China in 1986, Russia in 1994, and the Republic of Ireland in 2011, and meetings with five popes.
“Significant events include Elizabeth’s coronation in 1953 and the celebrations of her Silver, Golden, Diamond, and Platinum jubilees in 1977, 2002, 2012, and 2022, respectively. She faced occasional republican sentiment and media criticism of her family, particularly after the breakdowns of her children’s marriages, her annus horribilis in 1992 [a year marked by British royals’ egregious scandals], and the death of her former daughter-in-law Diana, Princess of Wales, in 1997. She was served by more than 170 prime ministers across her realms. Throughout her lifetime, support for the monarchy in the United Kingdom remained consistently high, as did her personal popularity. Elizabeth died aged 96 at Balmoral Castle, Aberdeenshire [in Scotland], in September 2022, and was succeeded by her eldest son, [now] King Charles III.”
Love (from your scrivener),
Gene
*****
Queen Elizabeth II’s OLD legacy: The Gatekeeper Dies!
The Limits of British Power Today: Part 3 of 4.
By Gene W. Edwards
As suggested in the above, the United Kingdom (UK) of today is much diminished from its heyday, in the 1920s, when it held legislative rulership over one-third of the world’s population and one quarter of the world’s landmass. The British Commonwealth by the 1920s included 88 countries and territories. Find that list online.
Our Thomas Payne once remarked, “There is something very absurd in supposing a continent [ours] to be perpetually governed by an island [England].” Those “continents” once included the British ownership and control of America, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada, not to mention extremely populous places like India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.
*****
The entire British Isles comprise less than 100,000 square miles (like 300 X 320 miles in area). That’s the same area contained in my state of Colorado. The British Isles are Scotland, Wales, Britain and Northern Ireland — and some of their nearby little islands. These comprise the UK, the United Kingdom. King Charles III is their head of state.
The total population of the UK is only 67,000.000 people in a world of eight billion people. That’s 1/130th of the world’s population and one-fifth of the USA’s population.
*****
There are also 14 British Overseas Territories (colonies), These are considered to be separate from the UK. The British Overseas Territories contain only 272,256 people (2019) on 667,132 square miles of land, almost all of which is Britain’s land on Antarctica (660,000 square miles). The 13 remaining British Overseas Territories comprise only 7,132 square miles (if you add them up) in total area. These are all small islands or island groups. See the “British Overseas Territories” file on Wikipedia. King Charles III is the head of state of all 14.
*****
With the death of Queen Elizabeth II, her son Charles now being England’s king, parts of England’s former holdings, particularly some of its “realms,” are slipping away. Those countries are entertaining no longer being associated with the British monarchy at all. The English monarch will no longer parade in their streets. Canada, New Zealand, and Australia are likely to be lost early in King Charles III’s reign. Even Scotland wavers on also becoming fully independent. These are countries that do run themselves but also still historically and socially recognize the British monarchy as their titular leader. Only England, Wales, and Northern Ireland can be counted on to remain dependably, and eternally, British other than some islands I listed and will list.
Britain is no longer a “big deal” except in ceremony, ceremony such as you saw on 9/19/2022 queen’s funeral, ceremony unequalled in all of human history! Half the world watched that funeral, including numerous heads of state, many of whom were from states that were formerly British possessions.
*****
Last to consider is Britain’s Commonwealth of Nations. See that Wikipedia file as well as its “Commonwealth realm” file. The Commonwealth consists of 56 member states. Also see Wikipedia’s “Member States of the Commonwealth of Nations.” Here is how the Commonwealth describes itself:
“We help to strengthen governance, build inclusive institutions and promote justice and human rights. Our work helps to grow economies and boost trade, empower young people, and address threats such as climate change, debt and inequality.” (“The Commonwealth of Nations,” Wikipedia.)
Any citizen of one of those 56 countries can also hold a Commonwealth passport and enjoy unimpeded travel between them. Many of them were formerly British possessions. The crown jewels are only that.
*****
The head of the Commonwealth is Charles III. He is king of 15 Commonwealth member states known as the Commonwealth realms — remember that term — while 36 other members are republics, and five others have different monarchs[10] [Wikipedia, “Commonwealth of Nations”].
Yes, as of 2022, these are still 15 Commonwealth realms: Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, The Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, and the United Kingdom. Regarding the 15, they are all independent countries but additionally share the same king (monarch) at the same time, King Charles III, their actual head of state.
The following countries are thinking of removing that monarch, and Britain, from their nation’s leadership to become fully autonomous in rulership: Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, The Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Saint Lucia. Thus, the monarchy’s power is sharply diminishing, leaving little but the UK and British Overseas Territories’ islands.
If you look up the realm countries, each is politically or governmentally described as a “federal parliamentary constitutional monarchy.” In each, England’s current queen or king is their titular head of state. The Crown prides itself on non-interference, but its former hold symbolically remains.
The British Commonwealth remains an enormous political and economic alliance, but mostly of quite independent sovereign states which simply share common values but are not ruled by the British monarchy.
*****
My point is, the British monarchy is soon becoming little more than window dressing. The following words came to me recently as I was coming out of a dream: “There are more people who want to see the monarchy [turned] upside down than right side up.”
Love (from a citizen of the world),
Gene.
*****
Queen Elizabeth II’s OLD legacy: The Gatekeeper Dies!
A Rogue’s Gallery of Flops and Failures: Part 4 of 4.
By Gene W. Edwards.
The personalities — their behavior and decisions — in Britain’s modern royal family may be its undoing. It is losing general respect among its vassals, the kingdom slipping away by degrees. Let’s start with Queen Elizabeth II.
Though she took power on 1952, she married her Prince Philip, who became the Duke of Edinburgh, in 1947. He was a member of a Greek and Danish crown line banished from Greece in 1945. Tall, Greek, and exquisitely handsome, he was 18 to Elisabeth’s 13 when he began courting her.
All is well and good so far because they both married into European-royalty family lines. He was not eligible to be England’s crown line king, so he was only her “consort,” but their four children were crown royals: Charles, Anne, Andrew, and Edward. The first three of them turned out to be a disappointment by royal standards, according to the nine rules I observed and explicated in Part I of this four-part series on Queen Elizabeth II. Here, I’ll recite the “rules” again for you. These are the rules she, the ruler, tried to adhere to, communicate, and enforce:
“(1) Royals cannot marry commoners. Royal blood can only marry royal blood and did so in Britain for 1,000 years! (2) Young male royalty, destined by royal succession to kingship, must marry a virgin (a what?!) royal. (3) Royals must be above reproach in public and private behavior. (4) Royals are not allowed to divorce, whether before or when in office. That is a bad standard to establish, a deficiency in role modeling. (5) Royals must be faithful in their marriages. (6) The king or queen is the titular head of the Church of England (the wedding of church and state); ceremonies often take place in the C. of E.’s cathedrals. (7)) Always, always keep a stiff upper lip. (8) Only make concessions to the above when you have to, and do so grudgingly, disapprovingly. Of such is social order and kingship — or queenship — over others. (9) Set the highest standard of public relations and dependence on you from others, your vassals. You are better than they are. Act like it.”
Charles, being the eldest, was expected he must marry an English blue blood, one who was also a virgin. Charles had his “loving cup” ears set back, by operation, in his teens and then he was put out to stud. He reportedly said that he fell in love with, was it, “hundreds of women,” but it is Diana he chose to marry. She was of just the right age, pedigree, and presentability. She was only 20 years old when they married.
Problem: he was already deeply in love with Camilla — who finally became his wife in 2005 — and had no love interest in Diana. He only married her to bear his children to carry-on the British crown line. Diana discovered his real intentions and feelings one day before their wedding.
Prior to selecting Diana, Charles and Camilla allegedly had a love child, a boy, whom they hid away. It was Simon Charles Dorante-Day, borne in 1965, when Prince Charles was 17 (underage) and Camilla 18. Camilla visited the child until he was age five. At age eight, the childe underwent several operations to disguise his looking like Prince Charles. Simon wants the Crown to match his DNA to Charles III’s, but fat chance that will happen with Charles now being king. Here’s the story: https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/queensland-man-who-claims-to-be-charles-and-camillas-son-drops-dna-bombshell-after-queens-death-c-8211844
I’d like to confirm this story but cannot.
Diana proved to be a disappointment for him. She was strikingly naïve, unlearned, and temperamental, and chafed under royal duties, of always being under a spotlight as an on-point spokesperson for the Crown.
Next, the un-royal, un-virgin, divorcee Camilla married another man because she was strikingly unwelcome to ever be anything to Charles but his secret paramour. Camilla’s marriage later broke up; she wanted Charles. Then Charles and Diana divorced, a royal no-no. Much of this played out under the public eye. Lady Di, at the time was the most followed and esteemed lady in the world, far outshining the queen! Diana also got most of the press coverage.
*****
Did the queen or Charles order Diana’s death? Few would be surprised to learn the truth about that, if we ever do. Was she carrying her Egyptian lover’s child? Did her crusade against land mines deem her dangerous according to England’s military, who allegedly used land mines to save lives? Once in Egypt, would she have squealed like a canary in a coal mine, complaining about the royals and telling all — like Harry and Meghan did — once safely way? All of these? Probably, yes!
So: in my opinion and research, her life was taken by Britain’s MI-6 secret service, who were ordered by “whomever(s)” to assassinate her. Three big, black, unmarked motorcycles quickly came out of nowhere, shortly after her limo entered the Paris tunnel, and were on either side of her limo, harassing her limo driver at high speeds, until a co-conspirator shone a blinding light into the driver’s face. The paparazzi arrived soon, getting in the way, and England’s chosen medics pushed others aside and took their own sweet time attending her wounds so that she would certainly die from the crash before she could receive lifesaving care in a hospital in a foreign country, France, all this safely away from British eyes. The death of Diana was too convenient and too circumstantial. All this was covered in an investigator’s book.
What was particularly missing in Diana’s nature was Queen Elizabeth’s and the Brits’ stiff upper lip. Prince Philip was tied to numerous infidelities for decades with a bevy of the world’s beauties — who were all bedded behind closed doors: out of sight, out of mind. The queen always put duty, loyalty, and country before self — and stayed married, put on a good show. Prince Philip was also connected to bisexual Dr. Steven Ward, who arranged trysts. Male members of the royal family also used CIA mind-controlled American MK-Ultra victims for sex. Anonymity there also. Prince Philip only attended the birth of one of their four children, Edward. It might be an exaggeration to say he was always there when she needed him.
Queen Elizabeth put up with such proclivities in her man, but Princess Diana came unglued from Charles’ infidelities. Note: her suicide attempts. During that time, she made dozens of anonymous calls that including threats. She also made some 300 steamy anonymous (crank) telephone courtship calls to a married art dealer, Oliver Hoare, and had an affair with him, a tryst the media called Squidgygate.
In short, Diana behaved more like a commoner than an entitled blue blood — and she actually cared about common people and wanted real love. All this excited the British tabloids and public gossip, and disapproval of the other royals, perhaps especially the stogey, restrictive, uppity queen and generally unpopular Prince Charles.
*****
The death of Diana left Charles free to marry. Of course, he would marry a commoner — of all choices, and a divorcee, the only woman he had loved, for decades, the one whom he wanted to marry: Camilla. Can we condemn them for loving one another? Queen Elizabeth’s demands, from tradition, that Charles marry a virgin royal, backfired. Both the Crown and Charles were blamed for the royal divorce, and later for Diana’s death, and probably justifiably so. Charles will never be forgiven by many. He seems kingly enough but seldom likeable.
*****
I’ll briefly here discuss Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip’s other children. Plain-looking Princess Anne married and divorced a commoner, Mark Phillips, who fathered a little girl by another woman during his marriage to Anne. She had met and “courted” another commoner, Timothy Lawrence, while married to Mark Phillips and later married Sir Lawrence. They remain happily married.
Prince Andrew married a royal, Fergie (Sarah Ferguson), a looker, who became the Dutchess of York. Their marriage dissolved, end-capped after a photographer snapped a photo of her financial advisor, John Bryan, an American, by a pool in France kissing and sucking her toes, along with other risqué pictures of them.
Turned out to pasture, Andrew later took up with convicted sexual pederast Jeffrey Epstein (deceased). They become friends. Andrew wanted liaisons often with Epstein’s 17-year-old “captive,” Virginia Guiffre, who ended up suing him for big bucks! Other victims and stories also emerged from Andrew’s exploits with Epstein’s pubescent “harem” and young, kept, beautiful women. The Guiffre story seemed to run for years until Andrew finally paid Guiffre off (with money from the queen?) in 2022, thereby ducking arrest and conviction in America! The royals now want little to do with him.
*****
A now a deeper look at King Charles III. He really only wanted to be a gardener! He talks to his flowers — what good gardener doesn’t?! — which brought ridicule. He was bullied as a boy in private school and he and Diana didn’t want that for their children, William and Harry. That also had consequences. See below.
My view of now King Charles III is a mixed bag. He’s quite entitled, has many personal servants and an imperious presence, is quite commanding. He’s constantly been in public view, making speeches and pushing the royal brand, internationally, for decades. He has the rep of being a self-described globalist and a power player — out of view. Let’s see how well he can hold onto the kingdom. Feckless Prince Charlie broke Diana’s heart with his cheating. He has also been accused of selling royal titles to rich Saudis and other financial crimes, and has been observed engaging in “inappropriate personal behavior.” He lacks Queen Elizabeth’s inherent nobility in public behavior and reputation.
*****
And now we’re back to the late queen, Queen Elizabeth II. Who was she, really? She was not a beauty like her randy sister, Princess Margaret, but she still held court and represented Britain to the whole world for 70 years! Her personal statecraft was impeccable in how she presented her stoic, controlled, benign self, and in her diplomatic ways. She was still the queen in England’s remaining 15 “realms.” See my Part III of IV, above, to understand what ‘realm” means.
In fact, she made such an impression on the world and its citizens, multiple rainbows appeared over Windsor Castle and other of her body’s locations after her death. I present this to you as the effect of group mind upon one’s very environment! In short, Queen Elizabeth’s serene presence set a standard for the ages! I consider her the best dressed woman of modern times, her solid pastel outfits, her always carrying her little coin purse. A hard act to follow! But who was she, really? I’ll discuss that soon, below.
*****
The plot thickens. She had two nephews, William, the heir to the throne, and Harry, both sired by her son Prince Charles and his Lady Di. William is bright and presentable, but he married a commoner, Kate (Catherine) Middleton. It is rumored William cheated on Kate with Kate’s best friend, but the walls don’t have ears. As for William’s brother, Harry, I suspect William lost part of his hair because of “Harry.”
*****
Harry was a drunk and partier, with little discretion or natural caution — and he always struck me as being rather dim. He was much damaged from the divorce, and the death of his mother, and is probably forever angry with his father. He smelled of alcohol and cigs until he married Meghan Markle in 2018, just five years ago, but she cleaned him up and brought him into her tent. So much has happened since then!
Although the queen pretended to tolerate and accept her, Meghan Markle had MANY strikes against her, to the royal Brit mind. Though a very attractive actress with a powerful, winning personality, she was (1) an American, (2) a divorcee, hence hardly a virgin, (3) a mulatto (half black/half white); (4) her birth family was a mess, notably her father and half-sister; and (5) she was not of noble or British ancestry, nor born rich. She had trouble adjusting to Queen Elizabeth II’s countless rules of conduct when in public: when to hug (seldom!), when to smile, how to be aloof, how to act royal, etc.
She came into the marriage with a hard-won five million dollars of her own but was still considered by many Brits and British royals (6) to be a gold-digger. In short, she couldn’t win for losing. The tabloids were savage to her, and many royals were aloof from her, cool towards her; she felt it.
The classic Meghan story is, she was at a table with three young ladies who were royal in pedigree and she told them that before she made it as an actress, her car door or car doors/windows were broken and she, for months, had to crawl through the trunk and over the front seat in order to get to the front seat to drive. The story got passed around in the England’s snobby places and tabloids: “Gold-digger!”
Meghan had started, with partners, the beginnings of a fabulously successful cosmetics business. With her name recognition and looks, she could have become a billionaire, like Kylie Jenner became, in that business — but the queen wanted her to ink a deal cutting the monarchy in, a deal that, essentially, shut her cosmetics business interest down.
Next, after all the problems with her family making headlines, she ended up isolated in her and Harry’s Frogmore cottage. She was close to a nervous breakdown before Prince Harry rescued her by taking her away to America.
*****
What was the meaning of all that? Remember the rest of the rules I wrote you about in Part I of these IV on Queen Elizabeth II? Here, again, are my additional observed rules or traditions British royals have to follow:
“There are a few other traditions I’ve observed. Male heirs must excel in military service and sports (notably, polo and horsemanship) — and be sent to a military-prep boy’s school to bully or be bullied, not protected. They also must join the miliary and excel as valorous commissioned military officers. Top male royals should be steeped in the classics of literature and history and be top level in their classes and in college. The most high-profile royals are constantly front and center, each making some 300 appearances a year in public relations duties for the Crown. They are also world statesmen, not “politicians.” They leave day to day governance to the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of their associated countries’, and holdings’, independent elected governments.” All of the above rules and traditions are exemplary, but only if adhered to, and the “royal” label is an offense against equality and opportunity.”
Meghan Markle was totally unaware of what she was getting into when she married Harry. With six strikes against her, and the royals at her throat rather than watching her back, the tabloids after her with the royals not shutting their character slander down, she was a lady without a country. A stiff upper lip, like the queen had, was insufficient to meet all the rigidity, rejection, and class snobbery she ultra-experienced even after the wedding and which would continue as long as she remained in England.
Harry was protected from being bullies’ punching bag because Charles and Di did not sent him to a private miliary-prep boy’s school like the one introverted Charles attended. Instead, he was educated and tutored in benign settings. He wasn’t up to dealing with Meghan’s challenges and all the blowback he got for marrying her. Once they became expats in America, they both “sold out” by ratting-out the royal family — which then took away most of his royal titles, military pension, and access. They now had a target on their back, like Princess Di had.
*****
And now I will go where no other “columnist” can or will go with this story. I have a gift of being able to evaluate the soul level of others, particularly if I know enough about them for my unconscious mind to make an accurate judgment. The scale runs from 0–100, and the number results match academia’s A (90–100%), B (89–89%), C (70–79%), D (60–69%), and F grades lower and lower. Here is how I rank some of the principals in the above story.
. The same is true for Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother and her husband King George VI: both 12. Why? These are people who in secret make hard decisions about how to advance the kingdom. For instance, I strongly suspect Queen Elizabeth II ordered Princess Di killed. I can’t prove it but her soul number shows it. England became great by looking out for itself at any and all moral costs. I’m speaking of just another form of authoritarianism and dominance. The royal “stiff upper lip” is rigidity, a kind face and diplomacy on the outside, but a James Bond amorality overruling any weakness or ill fortune by orchestrating raw power from inside castle walls.
Therein lies why monarchies, secrecy, and clandestine manipulation in governments must be overruled everywhere by transparency, human equality, and fair dealing. I’m speaking (rating 12) of hard, hard, hearts! The insider scuttlebutt is beyond the pale! I could tell you where to look to confirm my rating. That above is the big reason why I object to the British monarchy in particular. If they think they are better than you are, a commoner, they are willing to do anything to preserve their status and power — all out of public view.
Prince Philip: 35 (FFF)
Harry: 76 (a middle-C grade)
Meghan 87 (B+)
Her father: 32
William, heir to the throne: 67 (D+)
Kate Middleton: 78 (C+)
King Charles III: 23
Andrew, Charles’ brother: 21
Fergie, Andrew’s ex-wife: 87
Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother (King George VI wife): 12
King George VI: 12
These are the main characters in the royals’ present-day story. The queen represented the old guard (guardedness). Quite stubborn in her rigid protocols, she chose mammon (in her case, power and money) over selfless equality and egalitarian service. It is said that the royal families follow secret rituals, beliefs, and corrupt linkages, and feel they are set apart and better than anyone else, are entitled. Thus, they only marry royals, or did. My view: no one is entitled. Royals are no better than commoners. The above rankings suggest they are worse. I’ve spread their personalities out in this Part 4 for you to see.
*****
Now what follows is my intuitive view regarding these matters. Here:
See death of the old social strata. Monarchy must give way to democratic principles. England will lose most of its 15 Commonwealth realms — particularly its big countries — in which the British king is the head of state. By the year 2038, Britain will own little more than Wales, Northern Ireland, and a number of small islands proximate the UK and several others around the world. Even Scotland will leave the UK and become fully independent, by 2030. In 2020, in a poll, 56% of Scots wanted out, and only 36% wanted to remain in. Later, the Scots relented when COVID-19 abated and Britain got out of the European Union.
The Brits will drop the monarchy altogether by 2038 and their holdngs will be administered by Britain’s prime minister and House of Lords and House of Commons.
King Charles III will die in office in a handful of years, and William will take over. Death respects no one, comes on its own timetable — and the death of monarchical principles is coming soon, even in God’s trackless time.
Caution needed, as giant catastrophes are coming to the world, including by water. In the 2030s. England vulnerable. Sea walls and underground shelters will be needed there, and elsewhere. Empires live, and then empires die. Everything changes. A becoming anew leaves the old behind, including monarchies. Democracy includes no lords. Become anew means humanity reinventing itself to sustain itself. The England of tomorrow will not look or feel the same. Meghan Markle would be welcome!
Love (to be equal),
Gene.
Posted 10/8/2022.